DISCLAIMER

The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form. By accessing www.asklawxperts.com, you acknowledge that you are seeking information of your own accord and there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by ASK Law Xperts or its members.

This web portal is for information purposes only. No information herein constitutes legal advice, nor does accessing this portal create a lawyer-client relationship. ASK Law Xperts shall not be liable for any action taken by relying on the material provided on this portal.

The name, logo, and content of this website are the intellectual property of ASK Law Xperts. Unauthorized use or reproduction is strictly prohibited.

ASK Law Xperts  •  Adv. Sanjay Kumar  •  D/4029/2014, Bar Council of Delhi
9999374141  •  7599923456  •  sanjaykumarji@gmail.com

ASK Law Xperts

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988

MACT Compensation Calculator

Estimate motor accident death compensation under the Pranay Sethi (2017) and Sarla Verma (2009) Supreme Court formula.

MACT Compensation Calculator

Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Pranay Sethi 2017 Sarla Verma 2009

Estimate motor accident death compensation using the Supreme Court formula in Pranay Sethi (2017) and Sarla Verma (2009). Injury cases use different heads. Informational reference only.

Based on Pranay Sethi (2017) SC and Sarla Verma (2009) SC for death cases, and Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar (2011) SC for injury/disability cases under the Motor Vehicles Act 1988.

Enter Claim Details

Estimated MACT Compensation

Fill details and click Calculate
Multiplier Table Sarla Verma / Pranay Sethi — Supreme Court
AgeMultiplierAgeMultiplier
Up to 151546–5013
15–251851–5511
26–301756–609
31–351661–657
36–401566–705
41–4514Above 704
Future Prospects (Addition to Income) National Insurance Co. v. Pranay Sethi (2017) — Supreme Court
Age of DeceasedSalaried / Permanent JobSelf-Employed / Fixed Income
Below 40 years+50%+40%
40 to 50 years+30%+25%
50 to 60 years+15%+10%
Above 60 yearsNilNil
Deduction for Personal Expenses Sarla Verma v. DTC (2009) — Supreme Court
Number of Dependent Family MembersDeduction from Income
Deceased was married — 2 to 3 dependents1/3rd
4 to 6 dependents1/4th
More than 6 dependents1/5th
Bachelor / 1 dependent1/2 (50%)
Conventional Heads (Fixed Amounts) Pranay Sethi (2017) — revised +10% every 3 years
HeadBase Amount (2017)Revised Amount (used here, 2023 band)
Loss of Estate₹15,000₹18,150
Funeral Expenses₹15,000₹18,150
Loss of Consortium (per claimant)₹40,000₹48,400

The Supreme Court directed in Pranay Sethi that these conventional-head amounts be enhanced by 10% every three years. The revised figures shown reflect the escalation applicable from 2023. Courts may apply a slightly different rounded figure for the relevant year.

How the Compensation is Computed Section 168, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
StepFormula / Basis
Monthly income (A)Net monthly income of the deceased (proved or minimum wages)
Add: Future Prospects (B)As per age & employment type (Pranay Sethi table above)
Less: Personal Expenses (C)As per number of dependents (Sarla Verma table above)
Monthly loss of dependency (D)(A + B) − C
Total loss of dependency (F)D × 12 × Multiplier
Total compensation (L)F + Medical + Consortium + Loss of Estate + Funeral
Interest (M)Simple interest @ rate fixed by Tribunal, from date of filing to date of award (Section 171)
Final awardL + M
Injury / Disability Case Heads Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar (2011) — Supreme Court
TypeHead of Compensation
PecuniaryLoss of future earning capacity = Annual income × (1 + Future Prospects) × Functional Disability % × Multiplier
PecuniaryMedical expenses (actual treatment cost)
PecuniaryLoss of earnings during the period of treatment
PecuniaryFuture medical expenses (on medical evidence)
PecuniaryAttendant / nursing charges
PecuniarySpecial diet & conveyance
Non-PecuniaryPain, suffering and trauma
Non-PecuniaryLoss of amenities & loss of marriage prospects
Non-PecuniaryLoss of expectation of life (in serious cases)

In injury cases there is NO deduction for personal expenses and NO consortium/estate/funeral heads (those apply only to death cases). The key factor is functional disability — the loss of earning capacity for the victim's actual profession, which may differ from the medical/physical disability percentage (Raj Kumar v. Ajay Kumar). For example, loss of a hand may be 100% disabling for a driver but far less for a clerk.

Get in Touch

For Appointments at the Office in Rohini or Chamber at Karkardooma Courts.
Practicing Since 2014, Bar Council of Delhi.

Monday – Saturday  |  9:30 AM – 7:30 PM
Send Detailed Message

For Non-Urgent matters · Visit Contact Us page to fill the form

Contacting us through this website does not create an advocate-client relationship. Do not share confidential information until a formal engagement is confirmed in writing.

Visit Us

Office and Chamber locations of ASK Law Xperts.
Click any map to open in Google Maps for directions.

Monday – Saturday  |  9:30 AM – 7:30 PM