The Bar Council of India does not permit advertisement or solicitation by advocates in any form. By accessing www.asklawxperts.com, you acknowledge that you are seeking information of your own accord and there has been no solicitation, advertisement or inducement by ASK Law Xperts or its members.
This web portal is for information purposes only. No information herein constitutes legal advice, nor does accessing this portal create a lawyer-client relationship. ASK Law Xperts shall not be liable for any action taken by relying on the material provided on this portal.
The name, logo, and content of this website are the intellectual property of ASK Law Xperts. Unauthorized use or reproduction is strictly prohibited.
No results found for “”
Try pressing Enter to search the whole site, or use different keywords.
Frequently Accessed
Calculate maximum detention period and bail eligibility under Section 479, BNSS 2023.
Calculate chargesheet deadline (S.187 BNSS), default bail eligibility (S.479 BNSS / S.436A CrPC), and bailable offence bail right (S.478 BNSS). Enter arrest/remand date and offence — all timelines auto-calculated. Informational reference only; verify with advocate.
Common questions on detention, chargesheet deadlines, and default bail under S.479 BNSS / S.436A CrPC. Informational only — consult advocate for case-specific advice.
Section 479 BNSS is the successor to Section 436A CrPC. Both provide that an undertrial who has served half the maximum sentence shall be released on bail.
No — the accused must apply to the court. The court retains discretion to refuse where trial delay is attributable to the accused, or where special reasons exist (to be recorded in writing).
For first-time offenders (never previously convicted), S.479(1) BNSS first proviso reduces the threshold to one-third of the maximum sentence (instead of one-half), and the court shall release on bond unless special reasons are recorded — a stronger right than under S.436A CrPC.
Based on the maximum punishment for the specific offence — not an average. Examples (offences with no death/life punishment):
Important: offences where death or imprisonment for life is one of the punishments — e.g. murder, rape, attempt to murder, culpable homicide, dacoity — are excluded from S.479; no one-half/one-third benefit applies and the remedy is regular bail u/s 480 BNSS. Detention runs from date of arrest; time spent on bail (if later cancelled) is excluded.
Yes, but only on specific grounds recorded in writing — e.g., trial delay caused by the accused. Courts cannot routinely refuse without reasons. The Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2022) has emphasised liberal grant of S.436A/S.479 bail.
The first proviso to S.479(1) BNSS gives a first-time offender — a person never previously convicted of any offence — release after serving one-third of the maximum sentence (instead of one-half), and the court shall release on bond unless special reasons are recorded in writing.
No. S.479(2) BNSS bars this relief where investigation, inquiry or trial in more than one offence, or in multiple cases, is pending against the same person. The one-half / one-third release is meant for an undertrial detained in a single matter — not for a person facing several pending cases.
No. S.479 expressly excludes any offence for which death or imprisonment for life is one of the specified punishments. So for offences such as murder (S.103 BNS), rape (S.64 BNS), culpable homicide or dacoity, there is no one-half/one-third release — the remedy is regular bail under S.480 / S.483 BNSS decided on merits.
Yes. S.479(3) BNSS places a duty on the Superintendent of the jail to make a written application to the court for release of an undertrial who has completed the one-half (or one-third, for a first-time offender) detention threshold. It is a new safeguard so eligible prisoners are not overlooked — though the accused/advocate may also move the application independently.
Yes. Although BNSS came into force on 1 July 2024, the Supreme Court in 2024 directed that the benefit of S.479 applies to all undertrial prisoners in pending cases, irrespective of whether the case was registered before or after 1 July 2024, and jail authorities were directed to process eligible undertrials accordingly. (Verify the latest position before filing.)
Under S.187(3) BNSS, police must file chargesheet within:
The period runs from the date of first remand (not arrest). If arrest and remand are on the same date, that date is the starting point.
Under S.187(5) BNSS, the accused becomes entitled to default bail. This right must be claimed before the chargesheet is filed — even one day's delay after filing forfeits the right.
Once properly applied for before chargesheet, the Magistrate must release on furnishing bail bond — no discretion to refuse.
In ordinary BNSS cases, no. The 60-day and 90-day limits are absolute — once the period expires without a chargesheet, the right to default bail under S.187(5) BNSS becomes an indefeasible right that the Magistrate cannot refuse, provided the accused applies before the chargesheet is filed and is willing to furnish bond.
An extended investigation period (up to 180 days) exists only under special statutes such as the UAPA, NDPS Act or MCOCA — and even then only on a report of the Public Prosecutor seeking extension, filed and allowed before the normal period expires. S.187 contains no general power to routinely extend the standard 60/90-day timeline.
Under S.187(2) BNSS the maximum police custody is 15 days, but it may now be taken in one stretch or in parts. The key change from the CrPC: the 15-day police custody can be sought at any time within the initial 40 days (offences on the 60-day track) or initial 60 days (offences on the 90-day track) — not only in the first 15 days after arrest.
Police custody (PC) means the accused is held by the investigating police for interrogation; judicial custody (JC) means the accused is lodged in jail under the court’s authority and the police cannot interrogate without the court’s permission.
Under S.478 BNSS, a person accused of a bailable offence shall be released on bail — the court has no discretion to refuse. If no surety available, the court may release on personal bond (PR bond).
Exception: If the accused is simultaneously detained under another law (e.g. PMLA, NSA), or if non-bailable sections are also charged in the same FIR — the non-bailable provision governs.
The proviso to S.478 BNSS provides that where a person accused of a bailable offence is unable to furnish surety, the officer or court may release the person on a personal bond (own undertaking) instead of insisting on surety. The object is that poverty alone should not keep an undertrial in jail; indigent persons detained for a prolonged period may also seek release on personal bond.
Each operates independently — an accused can claim default bail even if the S.479 half-sentence has not elapsed.
No. This is an informational tool only. Actual bail grant depends on court's assessment of risk, offence nature, accused's conduct, co-accused position, and specific facts. Always consult a qualified advocate before filing any bail application.
Anticipatory bail (pre-arrest bail) is governed by S.482 BNSS (successor to S.438 CrPC). A person apprehending arrest in a non-bailable offence may apply to the Court of Session or the High Court for a direction that, in the event of arrest, they be released on bail.
Regular bail in a non-bailable offence is discretionary — under S.480 BNSS (before a Magistrate; successor to S.437 CrPC) and S.483 BNSS (special powers of the Sessions Court / High Court; successor to S.439 CrPC). The court weighs:
A proviso to S.480 allows more liberal consideration for a person under sixteen years, a woman, or a sick or infirm person.
For Appointments at the Office in Rohini or Chamber at Karkardooma Courts.
Practicing Since 2014, Bar Council of Delhi.
Primary Phone
+91 9999374141
Tap to call
Secondary Phone
+91 7599923456
Tap to call
+91 9999374141
Quick message
sanjaykumarji@gmail.com
Tap to send email
For Non-Urgent matters · Visit Contact Us page to fill the form
Contacting us through this website does not create an advocate-client relationship. Do not share confidential information until a formal engagement is confirmed in writing.
Office and Chamber locations of ASK Law Xperts.
Click any map to open in Google Maps for directions.
As per BCI Rules, 1975 (Rule 36) · Advocates Act, 1961 · Madras HC 2024 · BCI March 2025 Direction
As per the Bar Council of India Rules, advocates are not permitted to advertise or solicit work. This website is intended solely for informational purposes. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice or solicitation. An advocate-client relationship is established only upon execution of a formal engagement.
Contacting us through this website or by email does not create an advocate-client relationship. Do not share confidential or privileged information until a formal engagement has been confirmed in writing. By accessing this website you acknowledge that you are seeking information of your own accord and that no advertisement, personal communication, solicitation, invitation or inducement of any sort has been made by ASK Law Xperts or any of its members.
Enrolment Number
D/4029/2014
Bar Council of Delhi
Practicing Since
2014
Bar Council of Delhi
Enrolled Under
Advocates Act, 1961
Section 24
Courts of Practice
Delhi & NCR
District Courts · Delhi HC · Tribunals
हमारी नई वेबसाइट अब लाइव है
ASK Law Xperts ka naya informational portal ab uplabdh hai. Yahan aapko milega:
Regularly updated Legal Guides and Articles on Indian Law — informational reference only.
English is the authoritative version of this website.
This page uses automated machine translation. Legal terms, statutory section numbers, case names and procedural language may not translate accurately into Hindi, Punjabi or Urdu. For any legal interpretation, the English text shall be treated as final and binding.
कानूनी शब्द, धाराएँ और निर्णय स्वचालित अनुवाद में पूरी तरह सटीक नहीं हो सकते। किसी भी कानूनी व्याख्या के लिए अंग्रेज़ी पाठ ही अंतिम एवं मान्य माना जाएगा।